Featured post

INTRODUCTION

Bismillahirrahmanirrahim Hi, My Name is Muhammad Aiman Adib b. Mohd Noor, I studied  at  College Professional MARA Ayer Molek, Me...

Thursday, 28 March 2019

APPENDIX

HERE SOME OF PICTURE AND LINK DURING MY BUSINESS LAW CLASS









APPS THAT WE USE FOR OUR
 BUSINESS LAW
CLASS






















Tuesday, 26 March 2019

LAW OF HIRE PURCHASE

HIRE PURCHASE




Introduction

  • Hire purchase is an agreement between owner and hirer in which situation the owner letting goods to hirer by installment.
  • The legislation which govern hire-purchase in Malaysia is the Hire Purchase Act 1967.
  • A contract whereby the property in the goods comprised therein passes at the time of the agreement or upon at any time before the delivery of goods.
  • A contract which the person by whom the goods are hirer or purchase is a person who is engage in the trade or business of selling goods of the same nature or description as the goods comprised in the agreement.
Definition
  • Hire purchase transaction is a contract whereby the owner left out goods on hire and agrees that in complexion of the necessary payments the hirer may either return the goods and terminate the contract.
  • Section 2(1) defines hire purchase as a contract of letting goods with an opinion to purchase and agreement for the purchase goods by installment.
  • Hirer: A person who takes or has taken goods from an owner under hirer purchase agreement.
  • Owner: people who lets goods to a hirer under a hire purchase agreements.
Goods specified in the First Schedule. HPA 1967
- All consumer goods: goods purchase for personal family or household purposes.
- Motor vehicle: motor cycle, motor cars including taxi cabs and hirer cars, goods vehicle (not exceed 2540kg) buses.

Section 2(1)
#A person not being the hire or the owner or a servant of the owner, or whose behave negotiation leading to making of the HP agreement with the owner were carried out by whom or whose behalf the transaction leading to a HP agreement with the owner was arranged.

Goods
Motor Vehicle




Consumer Goods


Credit Corp. (M) SDN BHD v The Malaysia Industrial Finance Corp
Held: Until the hire had exercised his option to purchase the vehicle by paying out the total rentals & fulfilling all the agreement, no property in the vehicle passed to him.

Formation of a Hire Purchase Agreement
Formalities
Effect of disabling to parties to the contract
Effect of disobeying to the contract
Sec 4(1)(b): owner must in a written statement as set out in part 1 of the part 2 schedule
-Sec 4(5): failure to comply is an offence.
- Sec 46: Penalty of not more that RM3000/6 month jail
-Sec 4(4): contract is void
Sec 4A(1): agreement must in writing
-Sec 4A(3): failure to comply is offences
-Penalty according Sec 46
-Sec 4A(2): Agreement is void
Sec 4B(1): agreement must signed all parties after completed
-Sec 4B(4): failure to comply is offences

-Sec 4B(3): Agreement is void
Sec 4B: agreement must completed before intending hirer to sign
-Sec 4B(4): failure to comply is offences
-Penalty under Sec 46
-Sec 4B(3): Agreement is void
Sec 4C(1): agreement must include matters such as number of installment.
-Sec 4C(3): failure to comply is an offences
-Penalty under Sec 46
-Sec 4C: Agreement is void
Sec 4D(1)(4): a separate contract for each types of goods
-Sec 4D(3): failure to comply is an offences
-Under Sec 46 is penalty
-Sec 4D(2): Agreement is void
Sec 5: within21 days after HP complete, owner shall serve on each hire & guarantors, copy of the agreement.
-No penalty of crime
-Agreement is unenforceable by owner but faceable by the hirer

Protection For Hirer & Guarantors

Implied Condition

↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓

Sec 7(1)(b) The owner 
has right to sell

-owners shall sell goods 
to X when the payment
are completed by the hirer

↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓

Sec 7(2): The goods is 
Merchantable Quality

-where the hirer has examined 
the goods as regard defect 
which the examination ought to
have revealed
-if the goods secondhand

↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓

Sec 7(3): The shall fit for the
 purpose

-not implied if hirer examined the
 goods and knew the defect.

-A breach of conditions entitling
the party not in breach to repudiate
 the contract & sue for the damages

-A breach of warranty it does not entitle 
the party not in breach to repudiate the
contract but to sue for damages only.

Implied Warranties

Sec 7(1)(a): The hirer shall have & enjoy
quiet possession of the goods

Sec 7(1)(c): Goods must be free from 
any charge at the time when the 
property is too pass

Statutory Right of Hirer
  1. Sec 9(1) right to be supplied with the documents and information (at any time before final payment has been made)
  2. Sec 10 right to appropriate payment made in Hire-Purchase agreement (Hirer require the payment to be appropriate to a particular agreement)
  3. Sec 11 right to apply for an order approving the removal of the goods to another place. (hirer must keep the goods in a placed stated in agreement)
  4. Sec 12 right of assignment (hirer may assign his right, title interest with the consent of the owner)
  5. sec 14 right to complete the purchase earlier than due date (hirer may complete the purchase of the goods by paying net balance due under he agreement.
  6. sec 15 right to terminate the agreement (hirer has right to terminate the agreement at time by returning the goods to the owner during ordinary business hour at the owner's place of business.
  7. Sec 37(1) to pay regular installment (hirer under obligation to continue to pay the installment even the goods hirer has deteriorated or lost)
  8. Sec 38 the hirer cannot sell or dispose the goods because he is not the owner of the goods until full payment.
Statutory Right & Obligation of Owner

To cover the goods with insurance
  • For the first year of hire purchase agreement for motor vehicle. For other types of goods, cover with insurance at the time of hire purchase agreement. At repossession - sec 16(1) the right of the owner to repossess arises if there are default of the hirer to pay two successive payment and the installment not more than 75% of the total cash price of the goods.
  • serve a notice of 21 day to the hirer in  the 4 schedule.
  • Period of 21 day given to the hirer to surrender the goods or pay the arrears. Sec 17a person to show a written permit issued by the Controller or the Ministry.
  • If the hirer deceased, sec 16(1A) provides that repossession arises after default to pay 4 successive payment.
  • Sec 16(2) the owner need not serve the 4 schedule notice if there are reasonable ground believing that hirer will remove or conceal the goods.
After repossession
  • Sec 16(3) within 21 days after repossession the owner shall serve on the hirer aand guarantor the 5 schedule notice. Give second change to claim the goods.
  • Sec 16(4) after the owner has taken possession of the goods he shall deliver to the hirer a notice to show the receipt of the goods.
  • Sec 17(1) prohibits the owner to resale the goods to the third party within 21 days after deliver a notice under 5 schedule, unless agrees by the hirer.
Why Repossession is Done?

If still alive:
Sec 16(1): 
Failure or hirer to pay 2 successive monthly installment and payment of installments amount to not more that seventy-five percent of the total cash price of the goods comprised in the hire-purchase agreement.
If deceased:
Sec 16(1C): four successive default of payment

Summary of Procedure of Repossession





LAW OF AGENCY


Tuesday, 12 March 2019

SALE OF GOODS ACT (SOGA)

SOGA

Intro to Sale of Goods Law
# The Sale of Goods Act 1957 (SOGA)
   * s.1 SOGA - This Act shall apply to the States of West Malaysia

Definition Sale of Goods Act (SOGA)
#According to section 4(1) of sale of goods act defined that a contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfer or agree to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price.

"GOODS" (Sec. 2 SOGA)
   *Movable Property
   *Stock & Shares
   *Growing Crops
   *Grass
#Things attached to/forming part of the land: which agreed to be severed before sale.

1. Agreement/Contract (s. 5 SOGA)
#There must be an OFFER to buy/to sell goods at the price and the ACCEPTANCE of such offer
#The contract may provide for the =
   *immediate delivery goods.        
   *immediate payment of the price
            (The delivery & payment may be through installment)
#Contract of sale may be made in =
   *writing
   *by words of mouth
   *partly in writing & partly in words
   *may be implied from the conduct of panties

2. Parties
#Both parties shall have LEGAL CAPACITY to enter into the contract.

3. Price
#According to s. 9 means the MONETARY CONSIDERATION as to compensate for the sale of goods
#Price may be fixed by =
   *the contract itself
   *in the manner agreed in the contract
   *in the course of dealing between the parties
   *paying a reasonable price, if the price is not determined in any of the aforesaid ways

Classification of Goods

Existing Goods
Goods already owned or possessed by the seller.

#Ascertained Goods    
  Goods identified and agree upon at the time the contract made.
  (must be a legal owner)
#Unascertained Goods
  Goods not identify and agreed upon at the time a contract of sale is made and may be           identify and appropriated to the contract after the contract has been made.

Future Goods 
Goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller after the making of the contract of sale.

#Ascertained Goods
  Goods in existence but not yet acquired or possessed by the seller.
#Unascertained Goods
  Goods yet manufactured or invented 

Terms of Contract 

Condition
Warranty
A term essential to the contract
A less vital term of a contract
Sec. 12(2)
A stipulation essential to the contract the breach of which gives rise to a right to treat the contract as repudiated
Sec 12(3)
A stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract the breach of which gives rise to claim for damages, but not to a right to reject the goods & treat the contract as repudiated
  

S.13
Breach of Condition Breach of Warranty

General rule
 a breach of condition entitles the innocent party to repudiate the contract

Exceptions 
Some situations where the contract cannot be repudiated and the innocent party can merely claim damages 
  • Buyer waives the condition/ elect to treat that the breach of condition as breach of warranty - s.13(1)
  • Contract is not severable and the buyer has accepted the goods of part there of - s.13(2) + s.42
  • Where the contract is specific goods and the property in goods/ownership has been transferred - s.13(3)
Implied Terms of Contract (s. 14 - s. 17 SOGA)
#The SOGA implies a number of stipulations in every contract of the sale of goods.
#These implied terms apply only went the party to the contract of the sale have not excluded or modified them.
#There are -
   *5 implied condition
   *2 implied warranties



































Implied Warranty
#The buyer shall have quiet possession of the goods (sec. 14(b))
#The goods are free from any encumbrance (sec. 14(c))

I) Implied Term/Condition as to Title sec. 14(a)

  • Seller must have title/ownership/property in goods to transfer to buyer in sale of goods contract.
  • If seller does not have title, seller is in breach & buyer can repudiate contract
  • Case law: Rowland v Divall
  • Fact : The pf bought the car. After using it for 4 months, the pt discovered that it was a stolen car. The df (seller) has no title to it . The pt had to return the car to the true owner and the pt sued the df for breached of implied condition as to title
  • Held: The df had breached the implied term and the pt may rescind the contract and claim for the payment.

II) Implied Condition That The Goods Correspond With Description sec. 15
  • The obligation of the seller is absolute
  • all contract for Sale of Unascertained Goods are sales by description
  • For specific goods - Buyer has not seen the goods & is relying on description (eg. Mail order, catalogue)
  • Case : Nagurdas Purshotumdas & Co. v Mitsui Bussan Kaisha Ltd
  • Fact : Under the previous contract of selling & buying flour between the parties, flour bearing a well-known trademark Subsequently, the second order was made with the same as our previous contract : Flour the same quality were delivery but with different trademark
  • Held : The goods do not comply with the description.
III) Implied Condition as to Fitness for Particular Purpose - sec. 16(1)(a)
  • Exception to Common Law Rule : caveat emptor
  • Conditions to be fulfilled by the buyer in order to invoke sec. 16(1)(a)
* Disclosure of purpose
   case: Griffiths v. Peter Conway Ltd
   (coat - sensitive skin - flailed to inform the seller)
* Reliance on seller skill & judgment 
   case : Cammell Laird & co. v Maganese Bronze and Brass Co.
   (ship propeller - not fit the ship & its engine - relies on the seller expertise)
* Goods supplied are the kind that seller normally supply in his business
* The goods were bought under patent or trade name
   case : Baldry v Marshall supra
   (Bugatti car - touring - buyer relied on the dealer's skills & judgment)

IV) Implied Condition as to Merchantable Quality - s.16 (1)(b)
  • Exception to Caveat Emptor 
  • Merchantable quality = goods must not be defective. Goods must be of a quality suitable for its use - depends on the description of the goods.
  • if The Goods were unmerchantable, the seller would be liable for breach of implied condition , even though the are sold under their patent or trade name.
  • Case : Wilson v. Ricket, Cockerell & Co Ltd (fuel - coalite -coal - fireplace - exploded)
  • Exception : if buyer has examined the goods & defect ought to have been revealed, buyer cannot claim that seller has breached the condition.
  • If examination/inspection carried out but could not be discovered, implied condition as to merchantable quality applies.
V) Implied Condition in a Sale by Sample - s.17(2)

  • Condition are implied :
           1. The goods must correspond with the sample
           2. The buyer must be given reasonable opportunity to compare the bulk with the sample
           3. The goods must be free from defect rendering them unmerchantable which would not be                     apparent on reasonable examination of the sample
  • Case : Godley v Perry (catapult - injured the eyes-wholesale-unmerchantable)
#Bimplied Warranty as To Quiet Possession - s. 14(b)
  • Quiet possession : ability to enjoy usage of goods without interference from anyone (seller or third party)
  • If buyer's quiet possession is disturbed, it is a breach by seller. Buyer can only get damages
  • case : Microbeads A.G  v Vinhurst Road Marking Ltd (roadmarking-patentee) 
#Implied Warranty that Goods are Free from Encumbrance - s. 14(c)

  • Encumbrance = impediment / financial bar or restriction e.g. charge or an outstanding debt
  • Buyer can only claim damages when seller breaches the warranty (case : Steinke v Edwards)
 #Transfer of Property/Risk
   Definition
  • Transfer of OWNERSHIP of goods
  • Transfer of TITLE of the goods
  • "passing of property" x "passing of possession"
When the property in goods passes to buyer?
Gen. Rule:When the parties to contract intend that it should pass.

sec. 26: Unless the parties agree otherwise, risk is borne by the OWNER regardless of whether he is in possession or not.

Before - Seller's Risk
After   - Buyer's Risk

sec. 18: Contract for sale of unstained goods
- after the goods are ascertained

sec.19(1): Contract for sale Of Specific/Ascertained Goods 
- at such time as the parties intended it to be passed.

5) TRANSFER OF PROPERTY/RISK
When the property in goods passes to the buyer? Sec. 19(2)

The following are to be considered:
*Terms of contract
*Conduct of parties
*Circumstances of the case

Rules in SOGA 1957 as to the time when the property in goods passes to the buyer (sec. 20 -sec. 24)
i) Contract for sale of specific goods (unconditional contract) in deliverable state: sec. 20
  • when the contract is made
  • immaterial whether the time for payment of price/delivery or both.
ii)Contract for sale of specific goods & the seller is bound to do something to put the goods in deliverable state: sec.24
  • until such things has done & buyer has notice of it.
iii)Contract for sale of specific goods in a deliverable state, but the seller is bound to weight. measure, test etc in order to ascertain price: sec. 22
  • until such act is done & buyer notice of it.
iv)Contract for sale of unasertained goods or future goods by description in deliverable state: sec. 23
  • unconditionally appropriated to the contract by the seller with the assent of the buyer or vice versa. 
v)Goods are delivered to the buyer on approval or 'sale or return': sec. 24
  • when he signifies his approval/acceptance/does any act adopting the transaction.
  • retains the goods without giving notice of rejection.
6) TRANSFER OF TITLE 
General Rule
Legal maxim/rule : "nemo dat quod nan habet"
-No one can give a better title than he has himself
-No one can give what he or she has not got

Sec. 27 SOGA
"where goods are sold by a person who is not the owner thereof & who does not sell them under the authority or with the consent of the owner, the buyer acquires no better title to the goods than the seller had"

RATIONALE OF THE RULE
-To protect the right of owner.
-To protect the interest of the owner.

Lim Chui Lai v. zeno Ltd [1964] 30 MLJ 314 
Held: Ahmad was merely the bailee &not the owner of the chattles at the time he sold the to the Appellent. As he had no title to the chattels or authority to sell them, he could not give the appelant any title.

EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE OF
“nemo dat quod nan habet ”
Estoppel – s.27
Sale by a Mercantile Agent – s. 27
Sale by One of the joint owner – s. 28
Sale Under a Voidable Contract – s.29
Sale by a Seller in Possession After Sale – s. 30(1)
Sale by a Buyer In Possession After Sale – s.30(2)
Unless the owner of the goods is by his conduct precluded from denying the seller’s authority to sell
The person must have the authority to sell goods or consignment for sale or buy them or raise money on their security e.g. a broker, an auctioneer
Where the goods are owns jointly by several persons, a sale by one of the joint – owners may effectively transfer the title to the buyer
A contract is voidable under section 19 or 20 of the Contract Act 1950 when consent of the original owner is caused by coercion, fraud
This happens when the seller has transfer the property in the goods to a buyer but remains in possession of the goods.
The buyer obtains possession with the consent of the seller
Case: N.Z. Securities v Wrightcars Ltd



Case: Worcester Works v Coolen Engineering Co. Ltd
Case: Newtons of Wembley Ltd v Williams




























REMEDIES

  • A breach of contract of sale of goods may either be a breach by the buyer or seller
  • When either the seller or buyer breaches the contract of sale of goods, the other party who is no in breach is entitled to remedies. 
A) Right of Unpaid Seller Against The Goods

  • Breach by the buyer may occur as a result of the following
  • *Failure of the buyer to take delivery of goods - s. 44
  • *Failure of the buyer to accept the goods - s. 56
  • *Failure of the buyer to pay for the goods - s. 55
B)The right of an unpaid seller against the goods are
  1. A LIEN on the goods for the price ( where he is in possession of the goods): s. 46(1)(a), s. 47, s.48, s. 49
  2. A right of STOPPING THE GOODS IN TRANSIT in case of the buyer's insolvency (where he has parted with the possession of the goods): s.. 46(1)(b), s. 50, s. 51, s. 52, s. 53
  3. A right of RESALE : s.46(1)(c), s.54, s. 55
Breach by The Seller 
  • Where the seller is in breach, the following remedies are available to the buyer.
  1. Damages for non-delivery of goods (where the seller wrongfully neglect or refuses to delivery the goods to the buyer, the buyer may sue the seller for damages for non-delivery - section 57
  2. Specific Performance (The court has discretion to award a degree of Specific Performance - section 58
  3. Action in Tort (If the property in goods had passed to the buyer and he entitled to delivery.
  4. Damages for breach of warranty (The buyer is entitled to damages whenever there is a breach of warranty - section 59

INTRODUCTION


Bismillahirrahmanirrahim


Hi, My Name is Muhammad Aiman Adib b. Mohd Noor,
I studied at College Professional MARA Ayer Molek, Melaka. During my Diploma in Business Studies in Semester 6, All Semester 6DBS need to take course of Business Law. I create this e-Portfolio because this is part of my assignment for this Subject. Before i start with the topic that i learned in this subject i want give very special thanks to my respective lecturer, Madam Farkshima that always help I to understand in this subject. There is few topic that i have learned in class with my respective lecturer.